This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

Black-and-white illustration of outgoing and incoming construction supervisors comparing a work-area plan, with a Dig Daily Dose board at lower left.

Before the next trade starts

Use this editorial coordination check with the responsible project participants:

  1. Review what is complete and what remains open.

  2. Discuss changed hazards and current controls with responsible participants.

  3. Confirm the receiving supervisor's point of contact.

For the wider field-risk review, use our existing free Construction Risk Radar alongside the project record.

Make the Next-Trade Handoff Specific

The next crew is on the schedule. That does not tell its supervisor what changed in the work area yesterday, which question remains unresolved or who can answer it. A handoff becomes useful when the incoming team can connect the planned task to the conditions it will actually encounter.

Consider an illustrative coordination problem: one trade has finished its assigned work, but materials have moved and another activity is still planned nearby. The outgoing supervisor reports completion. The incoming supervisor hears that the area is available. Those statements can describe different things. Leadership needs to bring the two accounts into the same conversation before the next crew relies on an assumption.

Start with the current conditions

A construction case study by Babak Memarian, Sara B. Brooks and Jean Christophe Le examined 30 job hazard analysis documents and interviewed 23 professionals representing 17 companies. It identified coordination and communication gaps among the challenges and discussed keeping hazard information aligned with changing work conditions. The paper appeared in the International Journal of Construction Education and Research, volume 19, issue 2, in 2023, following online publication in 2022.

Our practical recommendation is to use the next-trade handoff as a short conversation about the actual work area. The three questions below are The Dig Daily Dose’s editorial checklist, informed by that case study. They support coordination; they are not a study-tested inspection form or a complete job hazard analysis.

Before the next trade starts: a three-point handoff

  1. Work area: What is complete, what remains open, and is the area ready for the next crew?

  2. Hazards and controls: What changed during the previous work, what hazards remain, and what controls are in place? Share this information with the incoming crew before work begins.

  3. Point of contact: Who can answer questions or resolve a conflict before work proceeds? Confirm the receiving crew knows whom to contact.

If one answer is unclear, resolve it with the responsible parties. Use this checklist to support the handoff; responsible project personnel determine the required checks, controls and authorization for the actual work.

Give the unanswered question a visible owner

In the illustrative example, the useful next step is to identify the unresolved interface rather than repeat that the earlier task is complete. The receiving supervisor might need a decision about the material location or the timing of the adjacent activity. Record the question in the team’s existing coordination system, name the responsible decision owner and identify when the answer is needed.

Keep an observation separate from an approval. A note saying that a package was moved describes an event. It does not establish that the new arrangement meets every project requirement. Route the technical decision to the responsible person and keep the outcome connected to the original question.

At the next coordination meeting, select one upcoming handoff. Ask the receiving supervisor to describe the planned work area and identify any unanswered question. Compare that account with the outgoing team’s account. The point is to expose a difference while the people who can resolve it are available.

A useful internal check: Of the handoffs selected for review, how many have an identified receiving contact and a traceable disposition for each open coordination question? Record unresolved questions separately. This is a proposed management measure, not evidence of improved safety, productivity or profit.

For a companion discussion on keeping materials and access organized, listen to Give Every Delivery a Clear Staging Plan. Use episode 342 to prompt the next conversation about the receiving footprint and ownership of material moves.

Source: Obstacles and Solutions to Implementing Job Hazard Analysis in Construction: A Case Study, archived in CDC Stacks. The checklist and coordination example above are our editorial application; the paper does not establish their effectiveness.

Share this decision: Forward this briefing to the supervisor receiving the next work area. New readers can subscribe to The Dig Daily Dose.

Builder Playbook

Builder Playbook

Straightforward, actionable, content marketing insights to help homebuilders connect with homebuyers.

Yes, that Arnold Schwarzenegger.

He has a newsletter on beehiiv. So do Codie Sanchez, Jay Shetty, David Begnaud, Colin & Samir, and Joanna Stern.

They could publish just about anywhere. They chose beehiiv to build a direct connection with the people who want to hear from them most. And you can do the same, whether you’re world-famous or just at the start of your plan for world domination.

Recommended for you

View all
caret-right